beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단3468

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2016. 10. 9. 20:50 경 울산 중구 C에 있는 피해자 D(25 세) 이 운영하는 ‘E 주점 ’에서 술에 취해 아무런 이유 없이 옆자리에 있던 손님들에게 “ 개새끼야, 뭘 쳐 다보 노 ”라고 욕설을 하여 위 피해 자가 피고인에게 조용히 해 달라고 요구하였다는 이유로, 탁자 위에 있던 소주병을 휘두르고, 집어던져 옆자리에 있던 손님 4명이 밖으로 나가는 등 소란을 피워 위력으로써 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on October 9, 2016, at the place prescribed in Paragraph 1, around 21:21, 2016, for the foregoing reason, was reported at the place prescribed in the foregoing paragraph (1), G (39:39) of the F District of the Police Station in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, who was called out after receiving a report

It is a police officer called up, and if you avoid the disturbance, it is not possible to avoid the disturbance;

Don't have been dynasty due to dynasty

” 라며 사건 경위를 확인하려고 하자, “ 짭새 새끼들 죽을래

"............. .... ..... ...... ...........................

계속하여 피고인은 제 1 항과 같은 사유로 현행 범인으로 체포되어 순찰차에 탑승하던 중, 현장지원을 나온 울산 중부 경찰서 H 소속 경사 I(48 세) 의 얼굴 부위를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the above G, I's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order was that the defendant expressed a desire to customers and was on the duty of a prisoner.