beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.12.04 2014노36

사기

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant does not have obtained money by deceiving F and H by deceiving him.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 12 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 태국 팻부리도 차암시 D에서 ‘E’이란 상호로 호텔을 운영하고 있다. 가.

On March 2, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, who was in Thaiglutinous G in Thaiglutinous G, with the victim F. However, even if the victim borrows money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money within the due date of payment. On April 2, 2007, the Defendant enticed the victim as above, and received KRW 5 million from the victim H (the same person as the victim H and the same person as the victim stated in paragraph 2 of the next 2 of this Article) under the name of the national bank bank in the name of the Defendant’s seat of H (the same as the victim H and the same person as the victim stated in paragraph 2 of this Article), at the same place as before August 17, 2007, the Defendant agreed that “The victim would purchase the money in Thaik, with the victim’s name of 30 times a bill of exchange in the name of the Defendant (the two 3rd anniversary of its profits).”

However, in fact, even if the victim received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the profit within the time limit for the promise to invest the money, and there was no intention to pay the bill normally after one year.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim a 4,00,000 (one hundred and eight million,000,000,000 won) label for investment in the same place.

3 피고인은 2007. 9. 7.경 태국 팻부리도 차암시 D에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 E 호텔에서, 피해자에게 "태국 팻부리 차암에 있는 I모텔이 은행에서 싼 가격에...