2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant made confession of all of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth of the crime of this case, that the crime of this case is limited to a single-time medication, that is, the defendant has a family to support the defendant, that he does not administer the absolute narcotics in the future, and that he stated to the investigation agency about the person who supplied the phiphones, etc. The defendant has a record favorable to the defendant, that he has been punished twice as a crime of the same kind, that he committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had a record of being punished twice as a crime of the same kind, that he committed the crime of this case even though he was during the repeated offense period, and that the court below would have determined the punishment considering the favorable circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of the same similar case, and it does not seem that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.