2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Defendant

A is a person who operates an officetel sexual traffic business establishment called "D" in subcheon-si C A in 624, and the defendant B is a female employee of the above business establishment employed by the above defendant B.

1. Defendant A posted an advertisement on the Internet website “E” to receive KRW 90,000 won in return for sexual traffic from the F who reported and contacted the advertisement, and Defendant A had F go to the said business around June 22, 2017 and had F go to the said business.

B brokered sexual traffic in the same way from May 2017 to June 2, 2017, including paying KRW 90,000 to sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On June 2, 2017, Defendant B received 90,000 won from male customers in return for sexual traffic at the immediately preceding business establishment around 21:40 on June 2, 2017, and received 60,000 won from F who was informed by A, a business owner, to acquire 60,000 won, and received 90,000 won from F.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants and F

1. A seizure list;

1. A lease agreement for an officetel;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Selection of a fine

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and Selection of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Confiscation Defendant B: Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;