2. In light of the substance of the crime in this case, although the crime in this case is not less than the nature of the crime and the crime in this case, it is difficult to view that the damage caused by the crime in this case is relatively serious, the defendant is divided in depth, the defendant paid 3 million won and agreed with the victim, the defendant's sentence of imprisonment to punish the defendant and to invalidate the previous suspended execution (three years of suspended execution for two years) is deemed to be too harsh compared to the degree of the crime in this case, and the above defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime in this case, etc. are considered to be considered as being too harsh, and thus, it is not recognized that the sentence in the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.