beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고단5524

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2018, around 16:35, the Defendant used assaulting the Defendant, such as 119 first-aid vehicles (Guro 6-1) on the front side of the first-aid vehicle, and 119 first-aid vehicles (Guro 6-1) on the front side of the front side in order to treat and collect fire boxes where D, an first-aid worker belonging to the Seoul Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was faced with the said D’s breast part, sealed the said D’s breast part by hand, sealed the Defendant’s face with his/her hand, and sealed him/her as he/she can take the seat with his/her hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of fire officers on the dispatch duty of 119 report.

2. The Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the date, time, and place indicated in paragraph (1) at the time, and at the place, and used a 112 report to the effect that the police officer F of the Seoul Guro Police Station Emba, who was called out, was able to turn f on her first-aid vehicle and return home; (b) took a bath; (c) took the f’s face toward her face; (d) took the f’s bridge f’s seat toward her, and assaulted 5 times the f’s bridge.

The Defendant arrested a flagrant offender due to the obstruction of performance of official duties as above, and prepared related documents, and boarded the 112 patrol vehicles to escort the police station, and used the police officer F on board the back seat to take the seat of the Defendant’s head against the Defendant’s body. In order for the police officer F on board the back seat to prevent the Defendant’s head from facing the Defendant’s body, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s left left side buckbucks sub-chapter.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.