However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. From around October 1997, the Defendant: (a) had been using a mobile phone joined in the name of the branch from around 1997 to around October 2009; (b) requested the Defendant to create C resident registration certificates necessary for the change of a mobile phone device by communicating with C, who did not contact with C.

On October 15, 2009, the Defendant, without authority, produced a copy of the resident registration certificate of C in the name of the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, a public document that attached another woman’s photograph, by recording C’s resident registration number in an influence method through the name and influence box of the Mental Oil Center without authority to exercise.

Accordingly, the defendant forged his resident registration certificate, which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising it in collusion with the person who was not registered.

2. Counterfeiting of forged official documents;

A. A. Around October 15, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime, around October 15, 2009, presented a copy of the resident registration certificate to E with respect to forged C, as described in the above paragraph (1), at the F store in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E’s “F store” in the name of Seongdong-gu, and upon applying for change of the mobile phone device in the name of C, exercised it.

B. Around April 28, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around April 28, 2010, filed an application for the change of the mobile phone devices used by the Defendant again at the F shop; and (b) presented one copy of the resident registration certificate of the said E, which was forged as provided in the foregoing paragraph (1), to the said E; and (c) exercised it.

C. Around December 31, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime, around December 31, 2012, presented a copy of the resident registration certificate to the above E, when he/she applied for the change of the mobile phone device in the above F store, and when he/she applied for the change of the mobile phone device used by the re-Defendant, he/she exercised it to the said E by presenting one copy of the

3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On October 15, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime takes notes in the F shop around October 15, 2009 on the “application form for change of the device/USIM” which was kept at the place when the Defendant applied for change of the mobile phone in the above F shop.