beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.20 2017누69078

화물자동차운송사업불허처분 취소

Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On December 23, 2016, the Defendant’s truck listed in the separate sheet No. 1 with respect to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except that the fourth and sixth parts of the judgment of the court of first instance are used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

C. The following amounts were transferred from each account in the name of the Plaintiff’s spouse, a national bank, a single bank, and a community credit cooperative bank account in the name of C to a new bank in the name of C, an interest bank in the name of C, or an interest bank in the name of C representative E, and a new bank account.

On November 3, 200, 200. 20. 8 of the above 0. 2 of the 0-dong account No. 30. 2 of the 0-dong account No. 1 of the 0-dong No. 4 of the 0-dong account No. 1 of the 0-dong No. 4 of the 0-dong account No. 1 of the 0-dong No. 5 of the 20-dong Account No. 1 of the 0-dong No. 4 of the above 0-dong No. 5 of the 0-dong Account No. 1 of the 0-dong No. 5 of the 0-dong Account No. 1 of the 20-dong No. 1 of the 200-dong No. 4 of the 200-dong Account No. 1 of the 05-dong No. 1 of the 2005-dong Account No. 1 of the 2001-dong Account No. 4 of the 20. 5