except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:50 on September 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought to steal the victim’s detached houses owned by the victim D in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, with the knowledge of the existence of a usual empty house; (b) and (c) on the premise that the house was left in the house with the knowledge of the fact that it was a usual empty house; (d) opened the door door in the entrance door to the entrance door, thereby damaging the effectiveness of the entrance door by damaging the victim’s market price and destroying the entrance door; and (e) tried to steal the victim’s fluor in a cre of the door of the glass door, but the victim’s fluorous E was found to have been fluorous by hearing the sound of the glass door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of D (including the part of the E Statement);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 366, 342, and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Consideration, agreement, details of crimes, etc.);