물품대금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 248,493,100 and KRW 247,131,10 among them, from October 9, 2015 to the day of full payment.
1. The judgment on the cause of the claim is that from June 2001, the Plaintiff directly sold the Scar market product to the Defendant or traded with the Defendant by entrusting the sale of the Scar market product to the Defendant. On March 11, 2015, the value of the goods sold directly by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as of March 11, 2015 is KRW 193,581,300 in total (i.e., value-added tax of KRW 175,983,00 in value-added tax of KRW 17,598,30 in value-added tax of KRW 175,983,00 in value-added tax of KRW 81,80 in total (i.e., value-added tax of KRW 81,738,00 in value-added tax of KRW 81,738,00 in value-added tax of the consigned product) is either a dispute between the parties,
Meanwhile, on June 9, 2001, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 15,000,000 as advance payment for the goods supplied by the Defendant to the Defendant, and KRW 20,000,00 as the price for the goods around July 2015.
Therefore, as requested by the Plaintiff, the Defendant: (i) KRW 248,493,100 (=248,581,300 for direct sales proceeds + KRW 89,91,800 for the above consignment sales proceeds + KRW 15,000 for the above consignment sales proceeds - KRW 20,000 for the above consignment payments) and KRW 247,131,10 [240,100 for the price for the goods issued by the tax invoice as of February 29, 2016, excluding the amount equivalent to the value-added tax for KRW 13,620,00 for the goods paid at KRW 13,620,00 for the goods paid at the rate of KRW 248,493,100 for - (13,620,000 x 0.1) for the goods paid at the rate of KRW 36,201 for each of the following day after the record:
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting it.