beta
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.07.20 2017노155

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the court below on the unfair argument of sentencing, and the sentencing of the court below is not beyond the reasonable scope of the discretion, it shall be respected (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In this case, in full view of the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the fact that the Defendant is breaking and opposing his mistake in depth, and that the Defendant has no record of crimes other than the two suspended executions, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below against the Defendant was excessively unobced and exceeded the reasonable scope of the discretion.

shall not be deemed to exist.

The prosecutor’s assertion disputing the propriety of sentencing of the court below is not accepted.

2. The appeal by the conclusion prosecutor is dismissed for reasons.