The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution, probation, and 120 hours of an order to attend a course) is too unhued and unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the Act on the Number of Crimes and the frequency of crimes, etc. of this case, it is recognized that the nature of crimes is not easy, and that there are a number of criminal records including the history of having been sentenced to imprisonment, but the defendant confessions and reflects each of the crimes of this case. Meanwhile, all of the victims of each of the crimes of this case agreed in the court below. The victims of each of the crimes of obstruction of business of this case agreed in the court below or most victims do not want to be punished against the defendant, the victims of each of the crimes of this case did not want to be punished against the defendant, and all of the sentencing conditions such as the age, character, character, environment, criminal records, etc. of the defendant, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.