On April 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was affiliated with D Co., Ltd. EM EM Co., Ltd. 3 and was working as a representative of EM EM 75 completed 2 teams; and (b) on April 29, 2013, on the ground that, on the grounds that at least 07:00, the Defendant, the victim, the victim of the instant company, the final consortium, who confirms the quality of the vehicle assembledd in the EM, in the EM process (SIGN-OF), was not filled by one of three workers who work in the final verification process, such as painting quality, assembly quality, etc., at the time, was not an industrial accident that would suspend the process, and the Defendant did not have the authority to suspend the process.

On April 29, 2013, at around 07:14, the Defendant instructed workers G and H to suspend the operation of vehicles, etc. at the wrapping Rop Process, and obstructed the progress of the two-way subsequent vehicles by ordering them to stop one vehicle released from the front 2-load loading box installed at the front 2-load loading box of the above factory, by preventing them from leaving the front rop-rayer vehicle due to the interruption of work.

At around 07:28 on the same day, the Defendant continued to hold an OKra, an OK5 process for the completion of the above factory: Around 07:29 on the same day, the Defendant suspended the completion line by putting the location of the finishing part of the assembly process for emergency stop. At around 07:29 on the same day, the Defendant directed I, J, and K to suspend work.

At around 07:32 on the same day, the defendant would cancel the emergency stop of the above OK5 process suspended by L, who is the head of the above factory assembly 3 head, and re-exploited L, at around 07:35, the defendant installed the above plant loading box and re-exploited L, who is the manufacturer.

Ultimately, the Defendant.