성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
In light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in imposing a surcharge of KRW 12,00,000 on the defendant, and there was no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on additional collection.
In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.