However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 10, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and on December 17, 2013, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime from the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch.

On April 12, 2018, at around 00:46, the Defendant driven a string vehicle B while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.131% in the 1km section from the insular village to the 353rd roads of the same Soho-dong 353.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, and a copy of each summary order;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of the Defendant’s criminal records (such as the same type of force) for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving of the instant case, and the records and various sentencing conditions indicated in the present case’s records and changes, such as the control of the instant case, etc., the sentence like the text shall be determined.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.