If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

In using and managing the means of access, no one may lend the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any compensation, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

On February 27, 2019, the Defendant received text messages from a person who was named as “only possible to lend money,” and received a proposal to the effect that “Income Evidence is sent to a bank that is used by Neman with money from a low-income company,” and accepted such proposal.

3.4.Before the Defendant Company in Ansan-si Member C, a physical card connected to the D Bank Account (Account Number: E) under the name of the Defendant was lent to the person in distress of name, through the staff of the person in distress of name.

As a result, the Defendant promised to receive a future loan in return for an intangible expected profit, and lent the means of access to a person who has no name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The document and written statement of the F;

1. Application of the B Acts and subordinate statutes on dialogue;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.