However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 4, 2012, the Defendant: around 03:13, the Defendant heard the sound of the Defendant who was under influence of alcohol at the front of B, such as drinking and dispute, and took a bath to C, and received C’s 112 report; the police officer E, and the slope F sent out to the instant guard No. 7, etc. At the same time, the Defendant sent this dog to the police officer for treatment of the said 10 days, and sent to the right side of the said police officer for 10 days, and opened to the left side of the said police officer for 10 days, and opened to the left side of the said police officer’s 10-day treatment, such as assault and felling, felling, and felbling, etc., and opened to the left side of the said police officer’s 2-day treatment of the said felbow, and opened to the left side of the said police officer’s felbow, and opened to the front side of the said police officer’s hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to C, H, G, F, and E;

1. Application of a written request and reply statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty: Imprisonment;

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (1) of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes.