2. The fact that the defendant's mistake is divided, etc. However, the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in this case constitutes a case where the defendant committed a drunk driving twice or more, and is punished heavily by driving again, and the defendant committed a repeated driving twice or more during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant committed a drunk driving twice or more during the period of repeated crime, each of which belongs to the very high level of alcohol content, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall not be deemed to be heavier.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(In the judgment of the court below, the "injury" in Part 18 of the judgment of the court below is apparent to be a clerical error in the "damage, damage, etc. to property". Thus, it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the