A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for two years and one year and six months for a short term of two years, respectively.

prior to the pronouncement of this judgment.

Defendant

A is a self-employed person who assumes a false position as an attorney-at-law or the director of a certified judicial scrivener, and Defendant B is a student in the first year of E High School.

Defendant

A was able to rape by introducing another female juvenile who is difficult to report even if rape was committed, after he gets her fluencing a boom and drinking to the other students, including Defendant B, and he she was fluencing out a PC.

1. The Defendants conspired to rape in the order of suppressing the victim F (the age of 13) who Defendant B knows through a flat-to-being process. The Defendants attempted to drink the victim F (the age of 13) by suppressing the resistance.

around 22:00 on July 25, 2009, the Defendants: (a) moved to the F, “F,” and (b) moved to the Ecoos car owned by Defendant A, and (c) moved to the Hel one-story number of Helel located in Ecoos car in Ecoos car, Defendant A, and the F cannot be identified.

The Defendants: (a) performed games; (b) obstructed F from resisting by mixing with beer and beer who prepared in advance to F; and (c) Defendant A exceeded the clothes of the F under the influence of alcohol by force; (b) sexual intercourse once; and (c) Defendant B had sexual intercourse again with the F subject to rape as above.

As a result, the Defendants jointly raped F.

2. On July 27, 2009, the Defendants, at around 21:00, went to a Moel with which it is impossible to identify the trade name of the F, while playing together with I, J, etc., who is a high school student with a usual friendship.

Defendant

A around 04:00 on July 28, 2009, F made the mixture of beer and beerer, thereby preventing F from resisting any other matter, and he off off the clothes of the F under the influence of alcohol and rape once by sexual intercourse, and Defendant B raped F that was under the influence of rape as above.

As a result, the Defendants jointly raped F.

3. The Defendants, together with KK sent to the Juvenile Department, are F’s friendship and job offers in the above way.