사기등
1. The judgment below is reversed.
2. Defendant A’s imprisonment of one year and eight months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year and one year, and Defendant C.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (two years of imprisonment for Defendant A, one year and six months of imprisonment for Defendant C, one year and six months of imprisonment for Defendant C, one year and three months of imprisonment for Defendant D, and ten months of imprisonment for Defendant E) is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case is a serious financial fraud crime committed in a planned and organized manner with many unspecified persons under the so-called Bosing method. It is not easy to recover damage because the nature of the crime is poor, the scope of damage is unlimited, differentiated, and is in a structural aspect. The defendant A was in charge of soliciting cash withdrawal and delivery of passbook during the suspension period of execution of the same crime and transferring cash withdrawn from them to China. The defendant B was not only assigned the passbook under the name, but also assigned the passbook, and the defendant C was also in charge of delivering the passbook and receiving cash withdrawal. The defendant C introduced the defendant D and E as cash withdrawal or delivery of passbook, while taking charge of delivery of passbook and receiving cash withdrawal. The defendant D was in charge of delivering the passbook and receiving cash withdrawal, the defendant Eul was in charge of delivering the passbook, the defendant Eul was in charge of the defendant Eul's act of not returning the passbook to the defendant, the defendant Eul's 1 and the defendant Eul was in charge of the same kind of crime, and the defendant Eul's 1 and the defendant Eul 500, each of the victim's judgment and the defendant 1 and the victim.