However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From around 2013, the Defendant, who violated the law of defense, contacted D representative director D with the purpose of manufacturing and selling lighting devices in the former North Korea-gun B, and demanded D to supply the company’s products through a business such as solicitation or arrangement to the public official in charge of military units, and subsequently, D accepted the request.

Defendant: (a) had the aforementioned public officials in charge of the said military unit supplied “LED, etc.” amounting to KRW 59,340,00 to the Army EA around August 2013; (b) had D transferred KRW 10,00,00 to the Defendant’s usage account around October 28, 2013; and (c) had C had the 120,908,700 won to the ArmyF unit around May 2014 under the pretext of KRW 120,908,70 to supply “the boundary, etc. of the military force” under the pretext of KRW 1205,00 to the KF unit; (d) had D receive KRW 28,932,00 from D to the KF unit around May 20, 2014; and (d) had been supplied to Defendant 206, 196, 208, 209, 209, 209, 3.

As a result, the Defendant received total of KRW 131,386,025 on four occasions under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for affairs handled by public officials in charge of military units.

2. The defendant in violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds receives commission fees for solicitation or solicitation of affairs handled by public officials in charge of military units as described in the above 1.1. The defendant received the delivery of lighting devices related to military units from H operated by I (State).