10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

From September 10, 2016 to around the 19th day of the same month, the Defendant administered the Mesophical dose of the Mesofts (one philopopon; hereinafter “philopon”), which is a local mental medicine, in an irregular manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Request for appraisal of the results of the drug reaction test, and of urine samples;

1. A statement on narcotics appraisal;

1. The details of sending SK, the details of sending SK station, the details of sending the station, and the details of sending the station of LG;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2, and Article 60 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a sentence to imprisonment;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include not only the fact that the defendant was punished several times for the same kind of crime, but also the crime in this case was committed under the protection observation period for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the criminal investigation agency denied the crime for reasons that it cannot be understood by the investigation agency, etc., under unfavorable circumstances, the defendant was committed late and late, and the number of times the crime was committed once, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.