근저당권설정등기말소등기
1. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party), B, Appointed Party E, and F, who is the lawsuits of the deceased A;
A. Defendant C is listed in the separate sheet.
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C’s collateral security network A (hereinafter “the network”) had the burden of KRW 18,404,145 on the goods payment obligation to Defendant C.
The Deceased set up a collateral (hereinafter “instant collateral”) with the maximum debt amount of KRW 25 million on the real estate indicated in the attached list as collateral for the instant goods payment obligation to Defendant C.
B. On February 28, 2008, the Deceased repaid to Defendant C the amount of KRW 10 million. (2) Defendant D as Defendant C’s creditor on March 2, 2010, on the provisional attachment order No. 2010Kadan803, the provisional attachment registration of the instant right to collateral security was completed.
On May 20, 2010, Defendant D received a seizure and collection order of the collateral security right to transfer the provisional seizure of the collateral security right to the principal seizure from the Seo-gu District Court Branch Office 2010 other 4138, and completed the supplementary registration of seizure of the collateral security right on May 28, 2010.
3) Defendant D filed a lawsuit against the Deceased for the claim for collection against the Daegu District Court 2010Kadan39639, which sought payment of KRW 27,841,251, and on September 8, 2010, Defendant D and the Deceased had a judicial compromise as follows. 1. Defendant (the deceased refers to the deceased’s identity):
hereinafter the same shall apply.
) The Plaintiff (the instant Defendant C was already paid KRW 10 million to C (the intermediate omitted) on August 31, 2010 to the Plaintiff, a person with the right to collect the instant collateral security claim (Seoul District Court Seog District Court Seo-gu Branch Branch Branch Branch of 2010TTT 4138).
hereinafter the same shall apply.
(3) The plaintiff and the defendant confirm each other. 3. The plaintiff and the defendant confirm each other that no obligation exists in addition to the amount already paid under the above Paragraph (1) with respect to the claim on the right to collateral security of this case. 4) The defendant D reported the collection of the amount of KRW 10 million from the deceased's father branch of the Daegu District Court.
C. Death of the deceased.