However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

"2017 Highest 1840"

1. On March 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the Defendant, at around 23:10 on March 17, 2017, in the “D cafeteria” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s restaurant business by force by force, such as: (a) the Defendant reported the Defendant before the victim E, who is the owner of the said restaurant, in his/her business, to take a crypt and pay a fine; (b) the victim and the victim; (c) gathering the paintings located in the carcter; and (d) the sound crying, etc.; and (c) the customer, who took meals at the said restaurant, took the cafeteria business of the victim.

"2017 Highest 3985"

2. On June 8, 2017, the Defendant, from around 22:10 on June 8, 2017 to around 22:45, expressed that, from “H’s perspective of managing the victim G on the first floor of Suwon-si F, Suwon-si, the Defendant cannot sell alcohol unless the victimized person calculates it in advance, and expressed the victim’s desire to read “Chewing her” on several occasions, and was on the table table.

The victim's drinking business was obstructed by force, such as attempting to keep out of her country and her back from her country, by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1840"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation reports, site photographs, etc.;

1. Investigative report (to hear statements from victims by telephone), "2017 Highest 3985";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter referred to as the following conditions): The facts that are revealed in the record, such as committing a crime, are not good for the reason that the defendant filed a report of his in advance, and that there are many favorable records of punishment due to violence: The fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine between the last ten years, and the prosecution of this case is made after the prosecution of this case.