A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

The Defendants planned to newly build and sell Ba with D (one name "E", the suspension of indictment on the same day).

However, Defendant A was not able to pay the purchase price of the land, including the down payment, because Defendant A was in excess of his/her obligation due to the bankruptcy of the operation of a food-type business on 2009, including the amount of delinquent taxes up to 800 million won, and there was no special property.

Accordingly, D played a physical color of land; Defendant B played a physical color of the person who will pay the down payment instead of the down payment; Defendant A prepared a written contract for the land of this case at the time of the payment of the down payment, and conspired to play a role in raising business funds by receiving the loan as security.

D around 2014 according to the aforementioned plan, around 2014: (a) introduced the instant land outside Pyeongtaek-si F and eight (hereinafter “instant land”) to Defendant A; and (b) Defendant B was in a good investment place for the victims G known to the general public.

If an investment of KRW 50 million is made, 30 million may be made by raising profits within three months.

around November 5, 2014, Defendants and D decided to conduct a new construction and sale business by purchasing the instant land at KRW 3.134250,000,000 and making an investment of KRW 50,000,000 to KRW 30,000,000 within the three-month period.

It was called “a certain investment without absolute damage........”

However, in fact, Defendants and D only planned a remote plan to obtain a loan on the instant land as collateral, but did not have confirmed the amount of loan available to financial institutions, and there was no clear way to make a short-term profit, and Defendant A did not notify that such a situation was in bad credit standing.

Nevertheless, the Defendants made a false statement as above and caused the victim to do so on the same day.