When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 10, 2016, at around 18:45 October 10, 2016, the Defendant powdered on the ground that the Defendant, at the entrance of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and the Victim C (43 Dose) work as the head of this business office, performed alcoholic beverages first, without calculating the drinking value, was flicked, and “low flick is replaced by flick,” and the Defendant was equal to flick flick fl

In this regard, the 15 minutes of the disturbance did not appear, and the 15 minutes of the disturbance interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by preventing customers from leaving or entering the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol of light railing against C;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on-site CCTV attachment);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;