전기통신사업법위반
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to the Daegu District Court on July 13, 2017 to a two-year suspended sentence for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement), and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 31st of the same month. On December 22, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a three-year suspended sentence for a violation of the Telecommunications Business Act at the Busan District Court on December 22, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 12, 2018.
Defendant
B On December 22, 2017, the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Telecommunications Business Act at the Busan District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension on December 30, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive around December 30, 2017.
[2] Defendant A, from November 2016, was a person who operated a mobile phone sales store in the name of “G” from around 2016 to around 787, and Defendant B was an employee from around December 2016 to the said “G”.
Defendants opened a prepaid heart in the name of another person on the condition that they provide funds to the other person, and sentenced to transfer the matter to the name in the name of the third person.
No person shall use telecommunications services provided for the mobile communications terminal device in the name of another person or use it for the collection of the relevant fund by opening the mobile communications terminal device in the name of another person on condition that the person provides or lends funds.
Nevertheless, the Defendants, around January 9, 2017, had Defendant A’s land owner file an application to open a prepaid cable on condition of cash delivery of KRW 30,000 and exemption of KRW 50,000,00,000 in advance, thereby opening six prepaid cores, which are mobile communications devices in the H’s name, and transfer the prepaid cores in the H’s name to the unwritten name and use it for the recovery of the relevant fund from December 21, 2016 to February 17, 2017, as shown above, the Defendants opened a total of 37 prepaids in the name of another person, such as a list of crimes (1) (except once 6,39, and 40) (except once 6,39, and 40) in the name of another person.