2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is not deemed to be unfair because the defendant purchased or administered phiphonephones, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of suspension of execution despite the defendant's previous convictions for the same kind of crime, considering the defendant's age, sex and environment, the defendant's age, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstance after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.