beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.07.22 2015고단526

사서명위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on August 31, 2010, the summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on September 5, 2012, and the summary order of KRW 6,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court on July 11, 2014.

1. Around 00:10 on April 15, 2015, the Defendant was driving a Bren motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.074% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 5km in front of the training site for the reserve forces located in the Gu and Si/Gu from the front of the Mocoppphouse located in the Gu and Si/Gu, Gu and Si/Gun under the influence of alcohol of about 0.074% without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as indicated in paragraph (1) above, was discovered to have driven alcohol and drive without a license at the same place as indicated in the above Paragraph (1), and subsequently, was requested by D to receive personal information from the police officer affiliated with the police box of the previous U.S. police station, and was exempted from punishment, the Defendant’s personal information, such as the Defendant’s resident registration number, etc., of the Defendant’s friendship E and signed “E” in the column for signature of the driver’s signature

Accordingly, the Defendant forged E’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) above, submitted a falsified E’s signature to the police officer who was aware of the fact that he had duly formed a false E’s statement of de facto change, stating the forged E’s signature at the same time as indicated in paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the status of driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the status of standing under the influence of alcohol drivers;

1. Registers of driver's licenses and disqualified meetings of the main office;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

참조조문