A. (i) On August 28, 2011, B: (a) around 10:47, 201, the central separation zone was shocked by the negligence of driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the Honam Expressway Seoul, 96.4km at the speed of about 94 km in the city, which is located in the west-gun of Yongsung-gun (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant 1”) by driving the Cracing Rack Cor (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant 1”) owned by each Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Korea Co., Ltd.”).

D. She was driving the E-Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) behind Defendant 1’s vehicle at a distance of about 40 to 50 meters, and she did not keep the safety distance immediately after the first shock and did not avoid the vehicle due to negligence, without securing the safety distance immediately after the second shock.

【Defendant 1’s vehicle, which was sent back to the first shock as a result of the collision between Defendant 1 and Defendant 2’s vehicle, was eventually returned to Defendant 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as cage cage, ductal executives, eggs, ductals, dulllllle, Malllle, Mallell, Mallell, and matrial matrial, matrial, matrial, matrial, and matrial, matrial, matrial, and eu

(v) B, as an employee of the non-party company, was in operation of the Pyeongtaek Defendant 1’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident, he completed the first punishment of a mountain, and the wife, including the mother F who completed the sex funeral in the neighboring area and the Plaintiff, who was his grandchildren, was on board the food plant.

⑹ 한편, 피고 현대해상화재보험 주식회사는 소외 회사와 피고1 차량에 관하여 자동차종합보험계약을 체결한 보험자이고, 피고 더케이손해보험 주식회사는 피고2 차량에 관하여 자동차종합보험계약을 체결한 보험자이다.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the above facts of recognition as the basis of liability, the defendants are respectively.