2. It appears that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, and that the defendant deposited 1.5 million won for the victim C and 500,000 won for the victim F, respectively, is favorable.

However, in 2011, the Defendant was punished for the same crime more than 20 times, such as being punished by imprisonment for more than five months for the crime of injury, and the Defendant was sentenced to five months for the same crime in 2011 and completed the execution of the sentence on October 2011, and committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period after the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime. The Defendant committed the instant crime in the hospital emergency room, and the Defendant committed the instant crime in a repeated crime, such as being injured by the doctor who treated himself in the hospital. Nevertheless, considering the unfavorable circumstances, such as the failure to agree with the victims, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstance and consequence of the instant crime, the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.