However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a K5-car.

On June 1, 2018, around 23:35, the Defendant: (a) driven the instant car at the front 37 Docu High School, 233, a 233-day, and escaped without taking necessary measures, with the fault that the left-hand turn-hand turn-down, the steering direction, and the brake devices were not accurately set up in the direction of the Sinung Women’s Center, which was set up in the direction of the Sinung Women’s Center, in the direction of the Sinung Women’s Center; and (b) the victim Sinung-si, which was set up on the right side of the direction of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, was shocked to the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, thereby damaging the salary of the above report

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense.

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that a number of defendants have a criminal record related to a motor vehicle or a traffic accident, the fact that they should be punished strictly after the accident, and that they have not been agreed with the victim).