The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court, which found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding “farmland” under Article 34(1) of the Farmland Act, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.