교통사고처리특례법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CG125 Oral Ba.
1. On July 16, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the above Orabab on the 17:10 on July 16, 2013; (b) caused the Defendant to drive the said Orabab in order to drive from the 1085 Jinabow-dong 1085, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Defendant: (c) had a duty of care to accurately operate the front and rear and the left; (d) failed to perform the duty of care to prevent an accident; and (e) failed to perform the duty of care to prevent an accident; and (e) failed to perform the duty of care to prevent the accident, and (e) damaged the Defendant’s D’s eM3 vehicle operation by taking the part of the left-hand side of the Orabababa-si to repair the 468,661 won of repairing
2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road on which a mandatory insurance policy is not subscribed, but the defendant has driven the motor vehicle on the same date and time as, and at the same place as, the preceding paragraph.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Witness F or G testimony;
1. Some testimonys made by witnesses D, H and I (not reliance on the part inconsistent with the facts of crime);
1. The actual survey report and photographs related to accidents;
1. A traffic accident occurrence report;
1. On-site photographs;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the traffic accident of this case is not caused by the defendant's occupational negligence, since the victim D's vehicle which was followed is the back part of the victim D's vehicle driven by the defendant.
However, according to the above evidence, the defendant's Orala, who was in the air traffic signal at the time of the occurrence of the traffic accident in this case, started from the front side of the victim D's car, the victim D's automobile was approaching the first lane by the defendant's Orala while the victim D's car was in the first lane, and the part on the left side of the defendant's Orala is D.