However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 15, 2015, the Defendant, at around 04:20 on October 15, 2015, received a request for calculation of the drinking value from the injured party D (the 54 years old), and had already settled the payment, the Defendant mispercing that the injured party would demand calculation of the drinking value, thereby causing injury to the injured party, such as two open upper parts, where treatment is required for approximately 28 days, on the part of the fat, the head and the chest part of the fat, which is a dangerous thing in the fat, one time for the victim's face, and three times for the head and the chest part of the fat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs, field photographs, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the same Act provides that although the nature of the crime is not weak, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, there is no record of the suspended execution or heavier punishment, and the defendant is against the law

(2) The decision is delivered with the order for the reasons above.