If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 8, 2018, at around 14:00, the Defendant damaged the damage that caused the damage to the repair cost by exceeding the 125C Oral Ba, which is owned by the victim D, from the front side of the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, to the direction of the repair cost. The Defendant destroyed the repair cost by destroying the cellular phone in Samsung Ggal ju, which was left on the floor of the victim's Samsung Ggal juthy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant or D;

1. Application of the instant accompanying photographs and CCTV video CD-related statutes

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to seven million won;

2. Non-application of the sentencing criteria as the person selects a fine not to apply the sentencing criteria;

3. Determination of sentence: A fine of KRW 2 million has committed the instant crime, which, without any special reason, destroys and damages ozones, etc. owned by others.

There is a history of punishment for various crimes as well as like crimes.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the age and behavior environment of the defendant, motive means, results of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. as shown in the arguments in this case.