2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. From April 7, 1973 to May 19, 1980, the Plaintiff (B) served in Chutan for about seven years and one year and six months from January 1, 1988 to July 15, 1989, at D Co., Ltd., for about one year and six months from September 4, 1989 to March 31, 199, and at E Co., Ltd for about three years and seven months from March 31, 1993.

B. On April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff received disability diagnosis from the F Hospital located in the Magyeong-si with the “Sechopathic chronological chronology,” and filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on May 24, 2016.

C. On October 17, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition to pay disability benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff according to the results of deliberation by the Integrated Review Committee of the Defendant Daegu Regional Headquarters that the Plaintiff’s infertility was considered as the infertility of the elderly.

In response to the instant disposition, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Board of Audit and Inspection. However, on June 29, 2018, the Board of Audit and Inspection dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s request for review on the following grounds: “The Plaintiff’s request for disability benefit was diagnosed as the Egrehical Negal Neng and Go Station Egal Neng Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egal Egy

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8 through 10, 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is 85dB or higher in the course of carrying out carbon business for at least three years at the noise business place of E, etc.