정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant access to the Internet “D” NAP at the Defendant’s house located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, to the Defendant’s house located in Guro-gu, Seoul. The facts are as follows: (a) the victim E provided sufficient school meal materials through G living collaboration while operating the Defendant’s house with F children; (b) H, the principal teacher, did not impose an abuse on teachers; (c) the victim did not have a parent’s interview before the original child; and (d) the principal teacher did not interfere with the examination of the child; and (c) the principal teacher and the teacher in charge did not interfere with the tree, despite the absence of any fact, the victim refers to the victim so that it can be seen by an unspecified number of people, “I am 1. Mart by making it possible to see it by using two or more; and (d) do properly eating only a child care center opened once a month by the parents.
2. The current senior teacher shall make available to teachers the abuse of chips against children.
A. When A.I. enters a set, A.I. shall divide A.I. into his body and thrown away A.I., and A.I. chips.
그 땐 창문을 닫고 CCTV 사각지대에서 혼 내라고 가르칩니다.
3. At the latest, I do not refuse to do so, why you would late and do not want to do so by their parents.
4. G Life Collaboration "I will handle only nature food."
2.3 Madern, Madern, etc.
In fact, we have observed a lot of sees that there are many heads of the world with a large amount of strings.
5. I ambling and I ambling to us that I still have been aware of their three or more features.
“The notice was posted.”
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through information and communication network with the aim of slandering the victim.
2. Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (hereinafter “Act”) applicable to facts charged: To dismiss a victim’s non-prosecution of intent on March 14, 2017 after the institution of public prosecution under Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.