A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

Defendant

A 120,000,000 won,

1. Defendants’ co-principal - The Defendants in violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act agreed to receive a certain amount of money every month from oil stations selling pseudo petroleum through H, an intermediate hub for mediating the leakage of control information on pseudo petroleum products, to provide the Institute’s employees and employees with some of the money and information on the regulation to the oil stations selling pseudo petroleum. Defendant A, while managing the officers and employees of the Institute, provided a call from H, deducted the Institute from enforcement information after receiving a bribe (hereinafter “total liability”), and Defendant B, assisting Defendant A to take charge of financial management (hereinafter “fund management liability”).

According to the above conspiracy, the Defendants:

A. On February 2, 2012, H L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L

B. On March 2012, H meta at the parking lot for the rest area for the rest area for the rest area for the rest area for the rest area for the rest of the rest area for the rest area for the rest of the rest area for the rest area for the rest of the rest area for the rest of the rest area for the rest of the rest area for the above paragraph (a). around that time, H received total of KRW 45 million from H, including the call fee of KRW 30 million, and the call fee of the rest area for the rest of the rest area in the second location of the above paragraph (a) from those who are unable to know the above name, and the call fee of KRW 15 million,00,000,000

As a result, the Defendants were provided with KRW 75 million in total under the pretext that they conspired to make a solicitation about the affairs handled by public officials from H.

2. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct.