Judgment

In full view of all the factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, including the fact that the amount of damage to the larceny of this case is not so significant, favorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by larceny on January 27, 2014, and the Defendant committed the larceny of this case on June 15, 2014 after the execution of the punishment was completed, and then committed the larceny of this case in a repeated crime period; the Defendant committed the crime of this case by planned means, such as identifying the location of CCTV before the crime; the Defendant committed the crime of larceny of this case; the Defendant’s agreement with the victim or failure to pay damages; and the fact that there was several penalties including the same crime, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.