However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on July 18, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 16, 2017.

1. On January 2017, the Defendant, a mobile phone opening fraud, made a false statement that “A mobile phone call is insufficient to receive counseling due to a project. At the latest within three months, the Defendant would pay both the time-to-day cost, charge, and penalty at the time of termination.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have to carry out any business, but rather had the victim's mobile phone to purchase gift certificates, etc. through small payments, or to purchase them to make cashed or sell them to the intermediate seller of the mobile phone. At the time, the Defendant had no income, such as no specific occupation, while the Defendant was at the time, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the telephone fee including the mobile phone price, etc., even if he opened the mobile phone under the victim's name, such as where he was liable to pay approximately KRW

On January 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, opened one cell phone (D) in the name of the victim from the victim from the victim, and obtained and used the cell phone (F) in the name of the victim from the E Communications Agency on January 23, 2017. On January 23, 2017, the Defendant acquired and acquired the cell phone in the name of the victim from the E Communications Agency by using one cell phone (F) respectively, and acquired the same amount of financial benefits by means of making the victim pay the unpaid charges in total amount of KRW 1,343,070 in C Communications Agency, and KRW 3,608,920 in E Communications Agency, and KRW 3,608,920 in E Communications Agency, even if the unpaid charges amounting

2. On February 15, 2017, the borrowed Defendant: (a) contacted the victim B, who was an unclaimed area, with the victim B, and “dially consulted with the telephone,” and (b) requires money.

The principal shall be repaid to one month.

Even if it is erroneous, the father is the representative director of the construction business, and the mother is believed to operate the Moel at the port.