When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:00 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant sent to Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on the ground that: (a) the victim F, a police officer belonging to the Daejeon District E zone of the Daejeon Police Station, called the Defendant, returned home to the Defendant at the time when he was called to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant got home to the Defendant at the time. On the other hand, the Defendant got home to the Defendant. The Defendant got home to the Defendant. The Defendant d on the front day of the Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, called “the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol; (c) the Defendant got home to the Defendant.” On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s chest by cutting up more than twice the victim’s chest to the police officer of the Republic of Korea, thereby falling against the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of H and G

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking into account all of the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: (b) the Defendant confessions all of the crimes in this case and reflects the depth thereof; (c) the Defendant was a primary offender who has no record of punishment until now; (d) the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties as an contingent crime is relatively heavy; and (e) the damaged public official wants to punish the Defendant; and (e) the damaged public official wishes to punish the Defendant;