If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant worked as a bridge repair technician and victim B as a bridge repair site warden, and C as a remuneration problem, and the defendant has retired from office.

After withdrawal, the Defendant tried to work at the bridge repair company called D, and the victim cannot work because the victim talks that he/she would write on the side of D, making it impossible to do so.

On June 30, 2011, the Defendant asked the victim before Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E on June 14:45, 201, but the victim was recognized as being suitable, and the victim's face, ear, and kneee, and damaged the reputation of the victim for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (investigative Record No. 40, 41 pages);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;