However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 16, 2014, at around 19:10, the Defendant was unable to resist over 20 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant’s living woman E working at the Dda room operated by the 1st floor victim C of the Gyeonggi-gu 19:10 on June 16, 2014 as a hiversary employee; and (b) the Defendant was unable to resist for 20 minutes, such as the Defendant’s hiversing of the said D multilateral deposit with the steel-proof network.

As a result, the defendant got out of the customer who was frighten in a multi-facel, thereby obstructing the victim's multi-facel business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the agreement with the victim, and the fact that the defendant is going against);