At around 16:00 on April 14, 2019, the Defendant: (a) driven a hurd-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-

Accordingly, the above C is overtaking the Defendant and bath, and the defendant's vehicle's sudden operation in the future moved it to the left side of the damaged vehicle, and the defendant passed the above-mentioned motor vehicle by passing it, and then continuously rapid operation of the above C without any justifiable reason, such as rapid operation by changing the vehicle in the future, thereby threatening the above C and causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of each video CD-related statute;

1. Relevant Articles 151-2 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines concerning criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do1488, Apr. 1, 2006)