2. The judgment is the sentencing materials that are disadvantageous to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant has approximately 30 criminal records, most of them are criminal records related to violence, and that only three criminal records were punished by imprisonment with prison labor for violent crime, and that the criminal facts of this case have occurred during the period of repeated crime.

However, it cannot be said that the degree of assault against the crime in this case cannot be deemed to be serious, and that public officials are not at the location of injury, that documents were submitted from E, the agency to which the ruling belongs, to which the public officials belong, and that the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and consequence of the crime in this case are comprehensively examined, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., the sentence in the court below is proper,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.