정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant, along with B, C, and victim D, is a member of the F club operated by the E Center located in the racing-si. A.
On November 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s cell phone with the Defendant’s cell phone to the Kakakakao Stockholm account; (b) sent a text message to the Defendant’s Kakao Kakao Stockholm account, stating that “The Defendant sent the text message to the Plaintiff, which was originally extracted from Busan, by inserting the Kao 2 to the Kao Kao 2 (B); (c) the Kao 2, 1, 2013, 1, 200, 200, 2000, 2000, 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00.
However, the facts were not that of the victim and B.
Nevertheless, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communications network with an intention to defame the victim.
B. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice on the “FV bulletin board, a smartphone display, which is a cell phone of the Defendant and has access to the Defendant’s cell phone account and is operated by the E Center by 35 members, stating that the Defendant “FV bulletin board, a smartphone displayer, f.e., a smartphone displayer, is f.e., unfounded voice without any basis, and accordingly, f.e., g., h., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., whether he was a
However, the facts were not that of the victim and B.
Nevertheless, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communications network with an intention to defame the victim.
2. Judgment: The dismissal of prosecution is dismissed on the cancellation of complaint, promotion of information and communications networks and information protection, etc. under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.