소유권이전등기
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the parts pertaining to the Plaintiff, Defendant B, C, D, F, G, and H are modified as follows.
Defendant B, C, and.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for any further or additional statement as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary or supplementary parts] On the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added to the following:
“6) On August 9, 2018, an absentee adjudication was finalized on August 9, 2018 with respect to I, J, and K (hereinafter “I”) who is a resident of an attempted welfare district.
Seoul Family Court on July 20, 2018 (the Seoul Family Court Decision 2018Radan1290, July 20, 2018). Accordingly, Defendant F, G, and H succeeded to the following: (a) the sibling of I et al.
(2) Shares 1/6 in inheritance following Defendant 1’s N death = Shares 1/6 of shares in inheritance following the confirmation of an absentee declaration judgment on I et al. = Shares 3 (Inheritance from I, J, and K) ¡¿ 1/3 (the respective inheritance rates of Defendant F, G, and H) ¡¿ 1/3 (=+B) shares in inheritance ratio of 1/3 (=the above as mentioned above 7). Accordingly, Defendant F, G, and H are real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list of real estate (hereinafter “third real estate”).
) Section 5, Section 13, and Section 14, of the first instance judgment of "(based on recognition) are owned by each one-third of the shares as follows: (a) add "this Court has a significant fact" to the following table.
On the 11th of the first instance judgment, the “E” shall be added to the “D” next to the third instance judgment.
“C” of the first instance judgment No. 22, part 11, shall be added to “C” next.
Nos. 26, 10, 26, and 20 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.
In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, as a result of Gap evidence Nos. 9, Eul evidence Nos. 13 and 14, as a result of the order of the court of first instance to submit documents to the defendants by the court of first instance, the entire purport of the arguments by the court of first instance is as follows: (i) the market price in which the development gains of each real estate owned by the defendants as of the date of each sales contract against the defendants are reflected is as listed in the following "market price" column; and (ii) the list of