If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On January 16, 2013, from around 23:30 to 01:00 the following day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s legitimate restaurant business operation for about 1 hour and 30 minutes by having the victim D, who had been employed as an employee of the above restaurant in the above restaurant, among the food with having ordered Kim Ged Kim(1) on January 16, 2013, such as “a vehicle boomed Kim, a customer will not be made up with such a formula,” and a customer who had been eating in the above restaurant, again boomed Kim Ked Kim(1).”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;