In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

1. Defendant A

A. On September 22, 2015, at around 21:20, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as one hand, on the ground that: (b) on the street side of the D cafeteria located in Seosung-si, Gyeonggi-do; (c) reported the dispute and sent the dispute to the other party to the dispute; and (d) on the ground that the E Gyeong-si, called E Gyeong-si, sent the other party to the dispute.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

B. For the same reasons at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph (a), the Defendant openly insulting the victim F of the victim F, other than police officers, who called “I am flick, I amflick, I amflish,” and called “I amflish,” and called “I amflish,” to the victim F.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, assaulted the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant, who was a workplace club, committed an assault, such as taking the Defendant’s h’s knife, as a defective hand, to be arrested to Ha on the ground of the same paragraph as Paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes.

B. In addition to police officers who called “A” as referred to in paragraph 2(a) at the same time and at the same place, the Defendant openly insulting the victim H in addition to the police officers who called “A frist frist frist frist frist frist” and called “A frist frist frist frist frist frist frist.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Application of the video CD-related statute to the Defendants

1. Article 136(1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case committed by a legitimate police officer for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is unsanitary and insulting.